Last week, the District Court for the Eastern District of California denied the defendant’s motion for summary judgment of a False Claims Act (FCA) count against Aerojet Rocketdyne (Aerojet) for allegedly fraudulently inducing the government to enter into federal contracts when the company knew it was not compliant with cybersecurity requirements.
Continue Reading Government Contractors Face False Claims Act Liability for Cybersecurity Non-Compliance
Compliance
OIG Publishes Wide-Ranging Request for Information
One of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General’s (OIG’s) key compliance priorities is modernizing the agency’s program integrity and compliance information.
OIG has explained that its goals for this priority are to continue producing timely and useful resources and to make the resources it provides easier to access and use, to spur innovation and improve compliance programs. On September 22, in furtherance of these goals, OIG posted a request for information (RFI) on its website.
OIG Seeks to Understand Value of Its Resources
Although all of the guidance available on OIG’s website remains “good guidance,” many of the resources have not been updated in decades. In addition, advancements in technology now allow stakeholders to manage and operationalize data and information in previously unavailable ways. Through the RFI, OIG seeks input from the healthcare industry and the public on a wide range of issues, including how stakeholders use OIG’s resources, as well as how to improve the value and timeliness of those resources.Continue Reading OIG Publishes Wide-Ranging Request for Information
[Virtual Event] 8th Annual Compliance & Government Investigations Seminar
Please join us for the Compliance & Government Investigations Seminar hosted by Bass, Berry & Sims and FTI Consulting. Due to ongoing COVID-19 concerns, this event will be virtual only.
We are excited for this year’s complimentary CLE program, which will provide the same caliber of practical advice, insight into government developments, and thoughtful discussion from industry panelists you have come to expect from this seminar. This year’s topics include:
- Inside Scoop: Top Issues In-House Counsel Currently Face
- Update on International Trade Regulations and Enforcement
- SEC Update: Key Enforcement and Regulatory Priorities
- Running an Investigation
- Antitrust Is Back: DOJ and FTC Signal Significant Increase in Antitrust Enforcement
- Data Privacy Update
- Healthcare Fraud Enforcement Updates
- Hot Topics in Procurement Fraud in 2021 and Beyond
- COVID-19 Funding Fallout: Preparation for Government Scrutiny
This year’s seminar will be held from 8:30 a.m.–3:45 p.m. CDT on Tuesday, September 28. To register, please click here.
Click here to view the agenda.Continue Reading [Virtual Event] 8th Annual Compliance & Government Investigations Seminar
Join Us at the AHLA Annual Fraud and Compliance Forum 2021
We are looking forward to our involvement in the American Health Law Association Annual Fraud and Compliance Forum 2021 next month. Compliance & Government Investigations attorney John Kelly is serving as co-chair of the program, which will address emerging regulatory and enforcement trends, recent case law and legislative developments and best compliance practices in healthcare.…
Telehealth Scrutiny Following COVID-19 Pandemic
During the COVID-19 pandemic, many healthcare providers have relied on telehealth options to provide patients access to care. But, as I discussed in a recent article for Physicians Practice, “As long as utilization of telehealth services remains high, corresponding scrutiny and government enforcement efforts will remain focused on this area.”
In the article, I recommend ways that physicians and other providers can prepare for this additional scrutiny:Continue Reading Telehealth Scrutiny Following COVID-19 Pandemic
Register Now for the Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review Webinar
We released our Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Annual Review earlier this month. To serve as a companion to the Review, we’re hosting a complimentary webinar on Thursday, February 18, 2021 from 8:00-10:00 a.m. PT / 10:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. CT / 11:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m. ET. that will take a deeper dive into key focus areas covered…
Download and Register Now – Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Review and Webinar from Bass, Berry & Sims
Bass, Berry & Sims is pleased to announce the release of the newest edition of its Healthcare Fraud & Abuse Annual Review examining important healthcare fraud developments in 2020. Compiled by the firm’s Healthcare Fraud Task Force, the Review provides an in-depth and comprehensive analysis of the past year’s court decisions involving the False…
How Health Care Companies Can Protect Against Government Scrutiny of COVID-19 Relief Funding
In our previous article, we outlined steps companies can take now to protect themselves during later government investigations and enforcement actions related to COVID-19 relief funding. These steps include: leverage compliance resources, document the application/funding process, document how money is used, schedule an interim internal review, and respond to employee complaints. In this article we focus specifically on the health care industry and how companies can protect against inevitable government scrutiny after receiving COVID-19 relief funding.
The health care industry must be particularly vigilant about protecting against future enforcement risks because it is a highly regulated industry facing an enforcement perfect storm—fast cash, poor guidance and retrospective review. Congress allocated $175 billion to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act Provider Relief Fund (Relief Fund). To support an industry hurt by COVID-19-related patient surges, stay-at-home driven closures and elective procedure treatment delays, HHS adopted a strategy to release relief funds quickly and perform reconciliation on the back end. As a result, HHS released what it touted as “no strings attached” relief funds through a series of general and targeted allocations each with a list of somewhat vague terms and conditions. The only other guidance available were application instructions, where applicable, and a continuously evolving set of frequently asked questions.
Of course, no government funding comes with “no strings attached.” The government inevitably will review whether recipients of HHS relief funds met the eligibility requirements and complied with the terms and conditions for using relief funds. Given that any deliberate omission, misrepresentation or falsification of information related to the HHS relief funds comes with potentially severe consequences—including but not limited to revocation of Medicare billing privileges; exclusion from federal health care programs; and/or the imposition of fines, civil damages and/or imprisonment—health care companies should consider the following steps to support their acceptance and use of the funds:Continue Reading How Health Care Companies Can Protect Against Government Scrutiny of COVID-19 Relief Funding
DOJ Updates Guidance for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs as a Record Number of Companies are Receiving Federal Funding
While the government is writing checks to companies to cope with recent pandemic losses, it simultaneously updated its internal guidance for scrutinizing a company’s corporate compliance program. Earlier this week, the Department of Justice (DOJ) issued to prosecutors an update to its guidance document for the “Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs.” DOJ counsel has long considered the existence and adequacy of a company’s corporate compliance program when determining whether, and to what extent, charges should be brought against that company, as well as how investigations should be resolved.
This guidance document, originally published in 2017, assists government counsel with that evaluation process. While primarily intended for use in the criminal context, the same guidance could undoubtedly be considered during a civil investigation against a company, such as in a False Claims Act investigation. The guidance document and its updates are excellent resources for a company to use in the company’s ongoing evaluation of its compliance program.
Purposefully tailoring the compliance program to your company. Many DOJ updates reinforce the notion that a company should create a corporate compliance program that is tailored to that specific company, based upon its evaluation of its particular risks and anecdotes. For instance, the update clarifies that government counsel should consider “the company’s size, industry, geographic footprint, regulatory landscape, and other factors, both internal and external to the company’s operations, that might impact its compliance program.” And when evaluating whether the compliance program is well designed for a particular company, government counsel is directed “to understand why the company has chosen to set up the compliance program the way that it has, and why and how the company’s compliance program has evolved over time.”Continue Reading DOJ Updates Guidance for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs as a Record Number of Companies are Receiving Federal Funding
COVID-19 Compliance Conversations – Episode II (VIDEO)
As developments related to COVID-19 continue to unfold, Bass, Berry & Sims attorneys are monitoring the situation and providing guidance through a series of video chats entitled, “COVID-19 Compliance Conversations.”
In this episode, Lindsey Fetzer and John Kelly provide a brief overview of compliance considerations related to conducting internal investigations remotely. Watch the video…
