In a closely watched appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ruled on February 18 that to satisfy the causation requirement in False Claims Act (FCA) actions based on alleged Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) violations, the government or relator must prove that the alleged kickbacks were the “but-for” cause of the defendant’s allegedly false claims. The First Circuit joins the Sixth and Eighth Circuits in adopting this defendant-favorable standard, with only the Third Circuit requiring a less-stringent showing.Continue Reading First Circuit Adopts “But-For” Causation Standard for Proving Kickback FCA Violations

On March 28, the Sixth Circuit issued an important decision on the meanings of “remuneration” and “causation” under the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS), holding that remuneration “covers just payments and other transfers of value” and not “any act that may be valuable to another,” and that to establish False Claims Act (FCA) liability based on AKS violations, a relator or the government must prove a causal link between the alleged kickback scheme and the alleged false claim. Continue Reading Sixth Circuit Reins In Anti-Kickback Statute